2024-03-29T09:13:50Z
https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/cgi/oai2
oai:researchonline.jcu.edu.au:74580
2024-02-28T14:28:28Z
7374617475733D707562
74797065733D61727469636C65
Reply to V Gianfredi et al
Marx, Wolfgang
Veronese, Nicola
Kelly, Jaimon
Collins, Sam
Trakman, Gina L.
Wade, Alexandra
Lane, Melissa
Aslam, Hajara
O'neil, Adrienne
Hebert, James R.
Blekkenhorst, Lauren
Berk, Michael
Jacka, Felice
[Extract] Dear Editor:
We thank Gianfredi et al. for their generous comments regarding the methodology used in our recent umbrella review and welcome their clear discussion of common queries regarding the scope and methods of umbrella reviews. We believe their letter can serve as a valuable resource to guide the design, execution, and peer review of future umbrella reviews because it both informs the conduct of umbrella reviews and acts as a resource to inform researchers, reviewers, and readers of the scientific literature.
Oxford University Press
2022
Article
PeerReviewed
application/pdf
https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/74580/1/74580.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab151
Marx, Wolfgang, Veronese, Nicola, Kelly, Jaimon, Collins, Sam, Trakman, Gina L., Wade, Alexandra, Lane, Melissa, Aslam, Hajara, O'neil, Adrienne, Hebert, James R., Blekkenhorst, Lauren, Berk, Michael, and Jacka, Felice (2022) Reply to V Gianfredi et al. Advances in Nutrition, 13 (2). pp. 685-686.
https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/74580/
restricted