Testis unis, testis nullas: one witness is no witness. Criticisms of the use of oral history in nursing research
Biedermann, Narelle, Hayes, Barbara A, Usher, Kim J, and Williams, Ann (2000) Testis unis, testis nullas: one witness is no witness. Criticisms of the use of oral history in nursing research. Contemporary Nurse, 9 (3-4). pp. 220-227.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://www.contemporarynurse.com/archive...
In research, there is no perfection: no perfect method, no perfect sample, and no perfect data analyses tool. Coming to this understanding helps the researcher identify the inadequacies of their preferred method. This paper discusses the criticisms of the oral history method, drawing reference to its challenges and difficulties in relation to its use in nursing research. Oral history has the advantage over more traditional historical approaches in that the narrators can interpret events, personalities and relationships within the interview that are not accessible from written sources. The oral history interview may also provide a forum for unveiling documents and photographs which might not have been otherwise discovered. Nonetheless, oral history, like most methodologies, is not flawless. This paper discusses the limitations of oral history and suggests ways in which a nurse can use oral history to provide an account of aspects of nursing history.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Keywords:||oral history, nursing research, qualitative research methodology|
|FoR Codes:||11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1110 Nursing > 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||92 HEALTH > 9202 Health and Support Services > 920210 Nursing @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||24 Oct 2006|
|Last Modified:||12 Feb 2011 02:13|
Last 12 Months: 0
Repository Staff Only: item control page