Complicated ENSO models do not significantly outperform very simple ENSO models
Halide, Halmar, and Ridd, Peter (2008) Complicated ENSO models do not significantly outperform very simple ENSO models. International Journal of Climatology, 28 (2). pp. 219-233.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.1519
An extremely simple univariate statistical model called IndOzy was developed to predict El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. The model uses five delayed-time inputs of the Niño 3.4 sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) index to predict up to 12 months in advance. The prediction skill of the model was assessed using both short- and long-term indices and compared with other operational dynamical and statistical models. Using ENSO-CLIPER(climatology and persistence) as benchmark, only a few statistical models including IndOzy are considered skillful for short-range prediction. All models, however, do not differ significantly from the benchmark model at seasonal Lead-3-6. None of the models show any skill, even against a no-skill random forecast, for seasonal Lead-7. When using the Niño 3.4 SSTA index from 1856 to 2005, the ultra simple IndOzy shows a useful prediction up to 4 months lead, and is slightly less skillful than the best dynamical model LDEO5. That such a simple model such as IndOzy, which can be run in a few seconds on a standard office computer, can perform comparably with respect to the far more complicated models raises some philosophical questions about modelling extremely complicated systems such as ENSO. It seems evident that much of the complexity of many models does little to improve the accuracy of prediction. If larger and more complex models do not perform significantly better than an almost trivially simple model, then perhaps future models that use even larger data sets, and much greater computer power may not lead to significant improvements in both dynamical and statistical models. Investigating why simple models perform so well may help to point the way to improved models. For example, analysing dynamical models by successively stripping away their complexity can focus in on the most important parameters for a good prediction.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Keywords:||El Nino; climate forecast; statistical model|
|FoR Codes:||04 EARTH SCIENCES > 0401 Atmospheric Sciences > 040105 Climatology (excl Climate Change Processes) @ 80%|
02 PHYSICAL SCIENCES > 0299 Other Physical Sciences > 029999 Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified @ 20%
|SEO Codes:||96 ENVIRONMENT > 9603 Climate and Climate Change > 960303 Climate Change Models @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||15 Mar 2010 11:25|
|Last Modified:||18 Oct 2013 00:48|
Last 12 Months: 0
|Citation Counts with External Providers:|
Repository Staff Only: item control page