Influences in training in psychology and outcomes: a rejoinder to Dyck and O'Donovan
Helmes, E., and Wilmoth, D. (2004) Influences in training in psychology and outcomes: a rejoinder to Dyck and O'Donovan. Australian Psychologist, 39 (1). pp. 41-43.
|PDF (Published version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001...
In their reply to our previous paper that contrasts Australian and English-speaking North American training in clinical psychology, Dyck and O'Donovan agree with our comments on the lack of evidence for the benefits of additional training. Here we clarify the basis for our assertions about the state of training in professional psychology in Australia on the assumption that the basic model of entry-level training that is used here will remain in practice and not change to that proposed by Dyck and O'Donovan. Questions as to the competence and effectiveness of clinical psychologists are ones open to empirical study. We note the ongoing natural experiment in clinical training in Australia and encourage the open debate and active study of issues related to professional training.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Keywords:||clinical psychology; professional training|
|FoR Codes:||17 PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES > 1701 Psychology > 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||93 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 9399 Other Education and Training > 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||10 Feb 2010 15:36|
|Last Modified:||25 May 2013 00:51|
Last 12 Months: 0
|Citation Counts with External Providers:|
Repository Staff Only: item control page