Development and validation of a tool for assessing understanding of brain death
Tawil, Isaac, Marinaro, Jonathan, and Brown , Lawrence H. (2009) Development and validation of a tool for assessing understanding of brain death. Progress in Transplantation, 19 (3). pp. 272-276.
|PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
Background: Death by neurological criteria is often misunderstood by laypersons even though they make decisions about withdrawal of care and organ donation. No validated questionnaire for determining laypersons' understanding of brain death exists. Such a tool could be useful in clinical, educational, and research settings.
Methods: Brain death experts and a focus group of laypersons were used to develop a 5-item questionnaire with face validity. The questionnaire explores 3 concepts: apnea, irreversibility, and differentiation between cardiac death, brain death, and persistent vegetative state. The questionnaire was administered to separate groups of laypersons and experts and was readministered 7 to 10 days later. Test-retest reliability for individual items and overall score was measured by using Spearman rank correlation. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was measured by using Cronbach α. Utility of the questionnaire in discriminating between scores of laypersons and experts was evaluated by using a t test.
Results: Twelve laypersons and 13 experts participated. The test-retest correlation was significant for all questions (Spearman ρ range, 0.43-0.94) and raw score (Spearman ρ =0.91 , P< .001). Internal consistency was fair (Cronbach α =0.64). The questionnaire enabled discrimination of laypersons from experts, with mean (SD) raw scores of 3.0 (1.1) vs 4.8 (0.6), respectively (t test, P< .001). Removal of 1 item improved internal consistency (Cronbach a =0.70), but with a corresponding decrease in discriminatory ability.
Conclusions: This simple 5-item questionnaire for evaluating understanding of brain death has test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and can be used to discriminate between persons who do and do not understand brain death
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
Reproduced with permission from Progress in Transplantation.
|Keywords:||brain death, organ transplantation, questionnaires, validation studies|
|FoR Codes:||11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1103 Clinical Sciences > 110310 Intensive Care @ 50%|
11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1109 Neurosciences > 110999 Neurosciences not elsewhere classified @ 50%
|SEO Codes:||92 HEALTH > 9201 Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions) > 920199 Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions) not elsewhere classified @ 50%|
92 HEALTH > 9202 Health and Support Services > 920299 Health and Support Services not elsewhere classified @ 50%
|Deposited On:||06 Oct 2009 14:59|
|Last Modified:||13 Feb 2011 04:43|
Last 12 Months: 3
|Citation Counts with External Providers:|
Repository Staff Only: item control page