An old methodology in a new world: a comment on our current system of judicial decision making in tax cases
Dabner, Justin (2006) An old methodology in a new world: a comment on our current system of judicial decision making in tax cases. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association, 2 (1). pp. 144-157.
|PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/Jl...
The traditional approach to resolving tax disputes adopted by the judiciary is to look to the words of the legislation to identify parliament's intention. However this approach is founded on the fallacy that words have a ‘correct’ meaning which is there for the judiciary to discover. In fact, language is inherently imprecise and, typically, in difficult tax cases the determination of how the legislation was meant to apply to the facts of the particular case is at best a guess. Yet, as if in fear of a great lie being discovered, the judiciary will seek to clothe their guess with respectability by employing rhetorical devices designed to persuade the reader that they have identified the undeniable truth. However, ultimately, such a subterfuge does not do justice to the parties to the litigation nor establish an effective precedent. These cases fail a cost-benefit analysis. They indicate that a new approach is needed that is prepared to acknowledge the inherent uncertainty of language and to seek to establish a precedent by reference to the underlying policy objectives of the legislation. This will require mechanisms to assist the courts to identify the relevant policy considerations and to ensure that justice is done in the case at hand.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
Reproduced with permission from the Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association.
Dabner J. (2006). An Old Methodology in a New World: A Comment On Our Current System of Judicial Decision Making in Tax Cases. Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association 2(1): 144-157.
|FoR Codes:||18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 1801 Law @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||22 Sep 2010 15:48|
|Last Modified:||12 Feb 2011 02:42|
Last 12 Months: 20
Repository Staff Only: item control page