Mock-suspects' decisions to confess: the influence of eyewitness statements and identifications
Kebbell, Mark, and Daniels, Troy (2006) Mock-suspects' decisions to confess: the influence of eyewitness statements and identifications. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13 (2). pp. 261-268.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/pplt.13.2.261
An experiment was conducted to investigate ways of increasing the likelihood of an offender confessing. Ninety participants were asked to commit a mock-crime that involved them stealing a wallet. Later the mock-offenders were presented with evidence from a witness who was said to have seen the offence. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions in which they were presented with a witness statement that either contained detailed correct information, not-detailed correct information, or incorrect information. Further, half in each condition were told the witness had identified them, while the other half were told the witness had not identified them. Participants were asked about their likelihood of confessing to the crime, and were asked what had influenced their decision. The results indicate that incorrect information made offenders less likely to confess, while being identified or not, had no impact. The results are discussed in relation to police interviewing techniques.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|FoR Codes:||17 PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES > 1701 Psychology > 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||26 Nov 2009 13:23|
|Last Modified:||12 Feb 2011 02:35|
Last 12 Months: 0
|Citation Counts with External Providers:|
Repository Staff Only: item control page