Quantifying larval retention and connectivity in marine populations with artificial and natural markers
Thorrold, Simon R., Jones, Geoffrey, Hellberg, Michael E., Burton, Ronald S., Swearer, Stephen E., Neigel, Jospeh E., Morgan, Steven G., and Warner, Robert R. (2002) Quantifying larval retention and connectivity in marine populations with artificial and natural markers. Bulletin of Marine Science, 70 (Supple). pp. 291-308.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/um...
Quantifying larval retention and connectivity remains a major hurdle in the development of realistic spatially-explicit population models in marine systems. This lack of knowledge is primarily due to the difficulty of conducting mark-recapture studies in species that are characterized by the production of large numbers of small pelagic offspring that suffer high initial mortality rates. Advances in artificial and natural tagging methodologies have, however, significantly increased the ability of marine ecologists to track larvae throughout the pelagic larval phase and subsequent recruitment into benthic populations. Many of these empirical approaches are now possible with the development of DNA sequencing and mass spectrometric instrumentation in the last decade. The presence of artificial tags in recaptured individuals remains the only unequivocal method for marking marine larvae. However, the difficulties of tagging sufficient numbers of larvae, with negligible handling effects, are formidable. Natural tags, including genetic markers and geochemical signatures in calcified tissues, are rarely unique indicators of source location, but have a significant advantage because all larvae released from an area are indelibly tagged. Given the strengths and limitations of the techniques, an approach that combines two or more techniques will likely be necessary to quantify larval retention and connectivity over appropriate spatio-temporal scales. Where possible, such a multi-technique strategy should include both artificial and natural tags.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Keywords:||marine environment; animal tagging; genetic marker; methodology; population recruitment; pelagic zone; spatial distribution; larva; ecological connectivity; retention|
|FoR Codes:||06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES > 0604 Genetics > 060411 Population, Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||10 Jul 2009 13:58|
|Last Modified:||18 Oct 2013 00:31|
Last 12 Months: 0
|Citation Counts with External Providers:|
Repository Staff Only: item control page