Scale-dependent variation in coral community similarity across sites, islands, and island groups
Cornell, Howard V., Karlson, Ronald H., and Hughes, Terence P. (2007) Scale-dependent variation in coral community similarity across sites, islands, and island groups. Ecology, 88 (7). pp. 1707-1715.
|PDF (Published version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-0742.1
Community similarity is the proportion of species richness in a region that is shared on average among communities within that region. The slope of local richness (α diversity) regressed on regional richness (γ diversity) can serve as an index of community similarity across regions with different regional richness. We examined community similarity in corals at three spatial scales (among transects at a site, sites on an island, and islands within an island group) across a 10 000-km longitudinal diversity gradient in the west-central Pacific Ocean. When α diversity was regressed on γ diversity, the slopes, and thus community similarity, increased with scale (0.085, 0.261, and 0.407, respectively) because a greater proportion of γ diversity was subsumed within α diversity as scale increased. Using standard randomization methods, we also examined how community similarity differed between observed and randomized assemblages and how this difference was affected by spatial separation of species within habitat types and specialization of species to three habitat types (reef flats, crests, and slopes). If spatial separation within habitat types and/or habitat specialization (i.e., underdispersion) occurs, fewer species are shared among assemblages than the random expectation. When the locations of individual coral colonies were randomized within and among habitat types, community similarity was 46–47% higher than that for observed assemblages at all three scales. We predicted that spatial separation of coral species within habitat types should increase with scale due to dispersal/extinction dynamics in this insular system, but that specialization of species to different habitat types should not change because habitat differences do not change with scale. However, neither habitat specialization nor spatial separation within habitat types differed among scales. At the two larger scales, each accounted for 22–24% of the difference in community similarity between observed and randomized assemblages. At the smallest scale (transect–site), neither spatial separation within habitat types nor habitat specialization had significant effects on community similarity, probably due to the small size of transect samples. The results suggest that coral species can disperse among islands in an island group as easily as they can among sites on an island over time scales that are relevant to their establishment and persistence on reefs.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
Reproduced with the permission from the Ecological Society of America.
|Keywords:||species; richness; diversity; spatial separation; persistence on reefs; habitat; community similarity; coral; dispersal limitation; underdispersion|
|FoR Codes:||06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES > 0602 Ecology > 060205 Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl Marine Ichthyology) @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||96 ENVIRONMENT > 9699 Other Environment > 969902 Marine Oceanic Processes (excl. Climate Related) @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||21 Jul 2009 08:37|
|Last Modified:||18 Jun 2013 00:26|
Last 12 Months: 58
|Citation Counts with External Providers:||Web of Science: 15|
Repository Staff Only: item control page