Psychobiological predictors of exercise behaviour in postmenopausal women
Barnett, Fiona (2007) Psychobiological predictors of exercise behaviour in postmenopausal women. PhD thesis, James Cook University.
|PDF (Thesis front) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
|PDF (Thesis whole) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
Weight gain and the associated increased risk of obesity-related diseases are associated with the postmenopausal period. However, moderate intensity exercise may be protective for postmenopausal women through attenuation of weight gain. Despite this evidence, many postmenopausal women do not engage in regular exercise.
As exercise has a positive effect on body composition and the subsequent health of postmenopausal females, an understanding of why exercise levels decline in this population is needed. In particular, understanding the difference in exercise behaviour characteristics of exercising and non-exercising postmenopausal women may encourage more non-exercising postmenopausal women to obtain the health benefits of exercise. An understanding of the exercise behaviour characteristics of exercising and non-exercising postmenopausal women may also provide information for future health promotion policy directions for this population and allow for the formulation of guidelines for exercise professionals. It appears that the life event of menopause can become a barrier or an opportunity for postmenopausal women to exercise, depending on their exercise behaviour characteristics.
Postmenopausal women (N=101) resident in North Queensland volunteered for this study. A self-report questionnaire was utilised to determine the participants’ recent exercise history. Participants completed two exercise behaviour scales. The Selfefficacy for Exercise Scale is a barrier-specific, thirteen-item instrument listing common reasons for preventing participation in exercise. The Health Belief Model(HBM) scale required participants to indicate how much they agreed or disagreed with various statements relating to their individual health beliefs related to exercise and obesity.
Anthropometric assessments ascertained body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio.Resting heart rate and blood pressure were also measured. Participants then performed a six minute graded exercise test (GXT) to determine estimated maximum oxygen uptake (V& O2max). A second visit required participants to perform a twenty minute moderate intensity exercise bout on a cycle ergometer while measures of pre, during and post-exercise affect were obtained using the Subjective Exercise Experience Scale (SEES).
Following data collection, participants were categorised as exercisers (n=53) or non-exercisers (n=48) based on whether they had performed a minimum of 150 minutes of accumulated moderate intensity exercise in the past 7 days. Univariate and multivariate statistical tests including discriminant function analysis (DFA) were utilised to determine whether significant between-group differences existed for the physiological and psychological variables.
The non-exercisers had obtained a lower level of education (U = 971.5, p = .03),were at a lower stage of exercise change (U = 308.0, p = .00), had higher resting diastolic blood pressure (F1,99=7.57, p=0.01), BMI (F1,99=33.63, p=0.00) and WHR (F1,99=5.83, p=0.02) and lower cardiorespiratory fitness (F1,99=21.57, p=0.00) and exercise self-efficacy (F1,99=39.56, p=0.00) compared to the exercisers. Each of these variables may therefore represent barriers to exercise adoption for this sample of non-exercising postmenopausal women.
DFA determined that the postmenopausal women with higher exercise self-efficacy,lower BMI and higher cardiorespiratory fitness were more likely to be exercisers. DFA also found that the barrier to exercise items of perceived lack of time,difficulty getting to an exercise location and the weather provided the greatest discrimination between exercisers and non-exercisers.
Further analysis of exercise self-efficacy revealed that participants at different stages of change possessed different levels of exercise self-efficacy. Participants with the lowest exercise self-efficacy were in the precontemplation and contemplation stages of change, while participants with the highest exercise self-efficacy were in the action and maintenance stages.
DFA results for the HBM scale revealed that the non-exercising postmenopausal women had higher perceptions of susceptibility to developing an obesity-related disease, perceived a greater number of consequences from participating in regular exercise and felt they were less health motivated to control an obesity-related disease compared to the exercising women.
Separate mixed design repeated measures ANOVA found that no significant between-group differences occurred for positive well-being (SEESa) and fatigue(SEESc)during twenty minutes of moderate intensity exercise. However,follow-up univariate contrasts (Bonferroni)found that the acute exercise bout did have a beneficial effect for both groups across time, with higher SEESa scores postexercise compared to pre and during exercise. Additionally, SEESc scores for both groups were lower postexercise compared to during the latter stages of exercise. Further research on postmenopausal women residing in Australian metropolitan cities is recommended for determining whether the differences found in this study are unique to postmenopausal women residing in regional North Queensland.
|Item Type:||Thesis (PhD)|
|Keywords:||postmenopause, postmenopausal women, exercise behaviour, women’s health, health behaviour, physiology, psychology, health benefits, health risks, participation rates, North Queensland|
|FoR Codes:||17 PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES > 1701 Psychology > 170114 Sport and Exercise Psychology @ 0%|
11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science > 110602 Exercise Physiology @ 0%
|Deposited On:||24 Mar 2009 09:19|
|Last Modified:||13 Feb 2011 20:06|
Last 12 Months: 78
Repository Staff Only: item control page