A case for mandatory reporting [comment on "The application of assessment of cumulative impacts in cultural heritage management: a critique' by Luke Godwin]
Rowland, Michael J. (2011) A case for mandatory reporting [comment on "The application of assessment of cumulative impacts in cultural heritage management: a critique' by Luke Godwin]. Australian Archaeology, 73 . pp. 93-94.
| PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 88Kb |
View at Publisher Website: http://www.australianarchaeologicalassoc...
Abstract
[Extract] Luke Godwin has covered a board compass in this short piece and I only respond to issues that are most relevant to my own experiences.
I concur that the application of formulaic methodologies like ACI to CHM could be difficult for the reasons Luke suggests – i.e. identifying the extent and reliability of the datum, determining an acceptable threshold and determining when those thresholds have been exceeded. I admit, however, that prior to reading Godwin's paper I was not aware of the extent of ACI per se and of pressures to apply it to cultural heritage management issues.
| ID Code: | 19678 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article (Commentary) |
| FoR Codes: | 21 HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY > 2101 Archaeology > 210101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Archaeology @ 100% |
| SEO Codes: | 95 CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING > 9503 Heritage > 950302 Conserving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage @ 100% |
| Deposited On: | 21 Feb 2012 16:59 |
| Last Modified: | 21 Feb 2012 16:59 |
| Downloads: | Total: 2 Last 12 Months: 0 |
| Statistics: | More Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page