A case for mandatory reporting [comment on "The application of assessment of cumulative impacts in cultural heritage management: a critique' by Luke Godwin]

Rowland, Michael J. (2011) A case for mandatory reporting [comment on "The application of assessment of cumulative impacts in cultural heritage management: a critique' by Luke Godwin]. Australian Archaeology, 73 . pp. 93-94.

[img]PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
88Kb

View at Publisher Website: http://www.australianarchaeologicalassoc...

Abstract

[Extract] Luke Godwin has covered a board compass in this short piece and I only respond to issues that are most relevant to my own experiences.

I concur that the application of formulaic methodologies like ACI to CHM could be difficult for the reasons Luke suggests – i.e. identifying the extent and reliability of the datum, determining an acceptable threshold and determining when those thresholds have been exceeded. I admit, however, that prior to reading Godwin's paper I was not aware of the extent of ACI per se and of pressures to apply it to cultural heritage management issues.

ID Code:19678
Item Type:Article (Commentary)
FoR Codes:21 HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY > 2101 Archaeology > 210101 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Archaeology @ 100%
SEO Codes:95 CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING > 9503 Heritage > 950302 Conserving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage @ 100%
Deposited On:21 Feb 2012 16:59
Last Modified:21 Feb 2012 16:59
Downloads:Total: 2
Last 12 Months: 0
Statistics:More Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page