Different strokes for different folks: regulation of publicly funded incorporated legal services
Johnson, Sean (2009) Different strokes for different folks: regulation of publicly funded incorporated legal services. James Cook University Law Review, 16 . pp. 63-89.
|PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/JC...
The exemption from compliance with the provisions that regulate incorporated legal practices in the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld) by incorporated community legal services and incorporated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander legal services may have had good intentions, but the reality is that it has created a two tier quality control system for clients of legal service providers in Queensland. Clients of private incorporated firms have the benefit of a responsive regulatory system, whereas clients of publically funded incorporated legal services are excluded and operate within a complaints driven model with all its inherent weakness. This paper considers whether the exemption granted to incorporated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander legal services creates an inequality in standards and risk protection available for clients of private law firms and those who use publicly funded legal services.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
Reproduced with permission from James Cook University Law Review.
|Keywords:||legal services, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander legal services|
|FoR Codes:||18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 1801 Law > 180102 Access to Justice @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940405 Law Reform @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||07 Apr 2011 14:14|
|Last Modified:||08 Apr 2011 10:08|
Last 12 Months: 77
Repository Staff Only: item control page