Comparison of secondary ion mass spectrometry and micromilling/continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry techniques used to acquire intra-otolith δ18O values of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
Hanson, N.N., Wurster, C.M., EIMF,, and Todd, C.D. (2010) Comparison of secondary ion mass spectrometry and micromilling/continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry techniques used to acquire intra-otolith δ18O values of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 24 (17). pp. 2491-2498.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4646
The chemical signals in the sequential layers of fish otoliths have the potential to provide fisheries biologists with temporal and spatial details of migration which are difficult to obtain without expensive tracking methods. Signal resolution depends, however, on the extraction technique used. We compared the use of mechanical micromilling and continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (CF-IRMS) methods with secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to obtain δ18O profiles from otoliths of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and used these to corroborate the time of freshwater emigration of the juvenile with macroscopic patterns within the otolith. Both techniques showed the transition occurring at the same visible feature on the otolith, allowing future analyses to easily identify the juvenile (freshwater) versus adult (marine) life-stages. However, SIMS showed a rapid and abrupt transition whereas micromilling provided a less distinct signal. The number of samples that could be obtained per unit area sampled using SIMS was 2 to 3 times greater than that when using micromilling/CF-IRMS although the δ18O values and analytical precisions (∼0.2‰) of the two methods were comparable. In addition, SIMS δ18O results were used to compare otolith aragonite values with predicted values calculated using various isotope fractionation equations.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
EIMF (Edinburgh Ion Microprobe Facility)
|FoR Codes:||06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES > 0602 Ecology > 060205 Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl Marine Ichthyology) @ 50%|
04 EARTH SCIENCES > 0402 Geochemistry > 040203 Isotope Geochemistry @ 50%
|SEO Codes:||83 ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL PRIMARY PRODUCTS > 8302 Fisheries - Wild Caught > 830201 Fisheries Recreational @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||15 Mar 2011 15:59|
|Last Modified:||17 Jun 2013 01:28|
Last 12 Months: 0
|Citation Counts with External Providers:||Web of Science: 6|
Repository Staff Only: item control page