Evolution of bower complexity and cerebellum size in bowerbirds

Day, Lainy B., Westcott, David A., and Olster, Deborah H. (2005) Evolution of bower complexity and cerebellum size in bowerbirds. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 66 (1).

[img]PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
530Kb

DOI: 10.1159/000085048

View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000085048

Abstract

To entice females to mate, male bowerbirds build elaborate displays (bowers). Among species, bowers range in complexity from simple arenas decorated with leaves to complex twig or grass structures decorated with myriad colored objects. To investigate the neural underpinnings of bower building, we examined the contribution of variation in volume estimates of whole brain (WB), telencephalon minus hippocampus (TH), hippocampus (Hp) and cerebellum (Cb) to explain differences in complexity of bowers among 5 species. Using independent contrasts, we found a significant relationship between bower complexity and Cb size. We did not find support for correlated evolution between bower complexity and WB, TH, or Hp volume. These results suggest that skills supported by the cerebellum (e.g., procedural learning, motor planning) contribute to explaining the variation in bower complexity across species. Given that male mating success is in part determined by female choice for bower design, our data are consistent with the hypothesis that sexual selection has driven enlargement of the cerebellum in bowerbirds.

ID Code:13986
Item Type:Article (Refereed Research - C1)
Keywords:birds; bowerbirds; cerebellum; Hippocampus; sexual selection
FoR Codes:06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES > 0699 Other Biological Sciences > 069999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes:97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences @ 100%
Deposited On:17 Dec 2010 14:34
Last Modified:21 May 2013 01:21
Downloads:Total: 1
Last 12 Months: 0
Statistics:More Statistics
Citation Counts with External Providers:Web of Science: 26

Repository Staff Only: item control page