The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: Rationalization vs. biased elaboration?
Areni, Charles S., Ferrell, M. Elizabeth, and Wilcox, James B. (2000) The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: Rationalization vs. biased elaboration? Psychology and Marketing, 17 (10). pp. 855-875.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(2000...
A laboratory experiment examined the extent to which the reported opinions of others influence persuasion in individuals low vs. high in need for cognition (NFC). Reported opinions influenced the attitudes of high- and low-NFC respondents in the direction of the majority position. However, for high-NFC respondents, the effect was entirely mediated by the evaluation of topic-relevant arguments (i.e., biased elaboration). On the other hand, the influence of reported opinions on the attitudes of low-NFC respondents was not mediated by the argument ratings. Instead, their evaluations of the topic-relevant arguments were actually mediated by their attitudes toward the proposal (i.e., rationalization). These results are discussed in terms of the multiple-roles postulate of the elaboration-likelihood model (ELM) and the "consensus implies correctness" inference of the heuristic–systematic model (HSM).
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|FoR Codes:||17 PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES > 1701 Psychology > 170107 Industrial and Organisational Psychology @ 100%|
|SEO Codes:||94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9405 Work and Institutional Development > 940501 Employment Patterns and Change @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||16 Jul 2012 12:53|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2012 11:04|
Last 12 Months: 1
Repository Staff Only: item control page