A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges
Snell, Linda, Tallet, Susan, Haist, Steven, Hays, Richard, Norcini, John, Rothman, Arthur, Rowe, Richard, and Prince, Katinka (2000) A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges. Medical Education, 34 (10). pp. 862-870.
|PDF (Published Version) - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.20...
Purpose: This article discusses the importance of the process of evaluation of clinical teaching for the individual teacher and for the programme. Measurement principles, including validity, reliability, efficiency and feasibility, and methods to evaluate clinical teaching are reviewed.
Context: Evaluation is usually carried out from the perspective of the learner. This article broadens the evaluation to include the perspectives of the teacher, the patient and the institutional administrators and payers in the health care system and recommends evaluation strategies.
Results: Each perspective provides specific feedback on factors or attributes of the clinical teacher’s performance in the domains of medical expert, professional, scholar, communicator, collaborator, patient advocate and manager. Teachers should be evaluated in all domains relevant to their teaching objectives; these include knowledge, clinical competence, teaching effectiveness and professional attributes.
Conclusions and implications: Using this model of evaluation, a connection can be made between teaching and learning about all the expected roles of a physician. This can form the basis for systematic investigation into the relationship between the quality of teaching and the desired outcomes, the improvement of student learning and the achievement of better health care practice. It is suggested that the extent of effort and resources devoted to evaluation should be commensurate with the value assigned to the evaluation process and its outcomes.
|Item Type:||Article (Refereed Research - C1)|
|Keywords:||clinical teaching; education medical; evaluation studies; patient satisfaction; peer review, standards; professional competence,students, medical; tutor.|
|FoR Codes:||11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences > 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified @ 51%|
13 EDUCATION > 1303 Specialist Studies in Education > 130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation @ 49%
|SEO Codes:||93 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 9399 Other Education and Training > 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified @ 100%|
|Deposited On:||03 Dec 2012 16:28|
|Last Modified:||03 Dec 2012 18:00|
Last 12 Months: 0
Repository Staff Only: item control page